[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

FpML-VAL Valid Test Cases

To: <valwg@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: FpML-VAL Valid Test Cases
From: "Andrew Jacobs" <andrew.jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:22:55 -0000
Importance: Normal
Reply-to: valwg@xxxxxxxx
Sender: valwg@xxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AciQxhFezb6jCmBVQiCxtKgD5HWHEg==

Do we really need valid test cases? Wouldn't it be better to simply have more 'valid' examples that exercise more of the schema. At the moment it looks like many of the valid cases are just duplicates of the examples.

Any thoughts?

Thanks

Andrew Jacobs

Director & CTO

HandCoded Software Ltd

Mob: +44 (0)7710 304239

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FpML-VAL Valid Test Cases
  - From: Christian Nentwich

Prev by Date: FpML-VAL 0000661: ISDA 2003 Precondition falsely assumes a single contractualDefinitions
Next by Date: RE: FpML-VAL 0000661: ISDA 2003 Precondition falsely assumes a single contractualDefinitions
Previous by thread: FpML-VAL 0000661: ISDA 2003 Precondition falsely assumes a single contractualDefinitions
Next by thread: Re: FpML-VAL Valid Test Cases
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread