PartyObjectIdentifer

Subject: PartyObjectIdentifer

From: "Marc Gratacos" <mgratacos@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:36:32 -0400

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index :x-mimeole; bh=V/zG9ozE4BrZlGgmXbf6oQtMdlCHWS5OAFpALY687tA=; b=nOEcLGNxN4AhMMdILXhYaALYzguU0vWaiINopb1VLf5x6Eurptj0QQFRVkR31YG/k6 +FOacirITdx41N0pbhRrhCUCs/5DEjnlRhhTFPJvV9EAxwUPxKf0gcolcXRGvwRaLYJE JsELNGXw97JHZP6u+yYFUicmzxLLAf4W1m8WA=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer :thread-index:x-mimeole; b=KDnKf5prn8YUoh3wKUn83GX036UaH/v0m+AKF95fJOH8iD7639KdAhO8Zqxl9fZy+z +atrEJbJoNjdZOxqlt8zX9qlLTRuNO0NayMQm7iseFif75bNQtDdcNQmhh7j4AipbISz OEbWIrQX8nbWGIU3/xUDUO0vcWi/8Ekh9zx8U=

Reply-to: mtf@xxxxxxxx

Sender: mtf@xxxxxxxx

Thread-index: AcjSCRnDlfxdcKUQQbyjIahj68Mpaw==

As discussed last week, this is a first attempt to introduce a new model for identifiers. See attached diagrams. The assumptions I had in mind while putting this together were:

Disctintion between primary identifiers and aliases.
Kept an identifier block in the context of a party (same as current partyTradeIdentifier) so you’d expect one or more tradeIdentifier/eventIdentifier elements in message.
Kept version identification. Added it as an optional structure instead of a choice.
Generic PartyObjectIdentifier type for trades, events, contracts, or other objects.

Let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,

Marc

Attachment: tradeIdentifier.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: eventIdentifier.png
Description: PNG image

Follow-Ups:

RE: PartyObjectIdentifer
- From: Brian Lynn