Apologies, but I will not be able to make the meeting.
From: mtf@xxxxxxxx [mailto:mtf@xxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Brian Lynn
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 7:43 AM
To: mtf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: FW: MTF - Message Classification v1.00
For discussion at
today’s MTF meeting.
From: Lyteck Lynhiavu [mailto:LLynhiavu@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:05 PM
To: brian.lynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: MTF - Message Classification v1.00
1.
a
new version of the Messaging Object Model PDF (updated to 4.4 LCWD)
2.
a
classification of FpML Messages (Excel) grouped by the business process
associated with the post trade event (instead of grouping by the type of
business event (as shown in the PDF). It incorporates most your suggestions.
o (Both files are
complementary and color coding is in sync wherever possible.)
Please
forward to the MTF, if alright. I can make further corrections before the
meeting, if necessary.
Thanks,
Lyteck
-----Original
Message-----
From: Brian Lynn [mailto:brian.lynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 9:35 AM
To: Lyteck Lynhiavu
Subject: RE: MTF - Message Classification v1.00
I've added a column with my suggestions, for your consideration.
I also suggest that you add a column with the current subschema file that each
message is located in. I think that it should be similar to (but not
identical) to my suggestions - it would be interesting to see the discrepancies.
For the response messages, it would be interesting to add a column to
distinguish between processing failure type messages (TradeNotFound,
TradeAlreadySubmitted, etc.) and results (e.g. TradeMatched,
TradeMismatched). We agreed to consolidate the first type, but not the
second.
[...]
- Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Lynn [mailto:brian.lynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 4:34 PM
To: Lyteck Lynhiavu
Subject: RE: MTF - Message Classification v1.00
Instead of grouping the messages by the type of business event, they should be
grouped by the business process associated with the post trade event.
So, for example, under confirmation we would have messages for confirming each
of the different types of post trade event. Similarly for notification.
I think we will end up with business processes something like
- pretrade/RFQ
- trade execution
- confirmation
- notification
- consent negotiation
- reporting, portfolio recon
- cash flow matching
-----Original Message-----
From: mtf@xxxxxxxx [mailto:mtf@xxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Brian Lynn
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 1:57 PM
To: mtf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: MTF minutes April 18, 200WG
Implementation of vote on messaging
===================================
[...]
For the message consolidations, we agreed to produce a summary of messages by
business process and type (request, response, etc.) and use this a basis for
recommending the messages to be consolidated. Lyteck will develop a
spreadsheet to summarize this, based in part on the PDF of messages he
circulated today. However, we need to group similar processes on
different event types (e.g. notification vs. confirmation of post-trade
events).
**************************************************************************************************************************
The information contained in either this email and, if applicable, the
attachment, are confidential and are intended only for the recipient. The
contents of either the email or the attachment may not be disclosed or used by
anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any
use, disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail at
isda@xxxxxxxx then delete the e-mail and all attachments and any copies
thereof. This communication is part of an ISDA process and is not intended for
unauthorized use or distribution.
**************************************************************************************************************************