Re: MTF meeting invitation - Friday 11 am / 3 pm

To: mtf@xxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: MTF meeting invitation - Friday 11 am / 3 pm

From: Robert Stowsky <rstowsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:04:38 -0400

In-reply-to: <021c01c884fa$f0641380$d12c3a80$@lynn@global-emarkets.com>

Organization: Brook Path Partners, Inc.

References: <021c01c884fa$f0641380$d12c3a80$@lynn@global-emarkets.com>

Reply-to: mtf@xxxxxxxx

Sender: mtf@xxxxxxxx

User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)

Apologies, I will not be able to attend.

Regards,

Robert

Brian Lynn wrote:

Reminder ...

Next meeting will be this Friday (tomorrow) at 11 am (NY)/3pm (London). (Note UK time change. Sorry for those people in the UK who have trouble with the new time.)

US: 888 481 3032

Intl: 617 801 9600

UK: 0800 904 7961

Participant Code: 28413758

Agenda:

- Review/discuss overall implementation status report (see attached draft).

- Discuss request from CDWG for advice on how to model eliminate optionality from credit events where the content model isn’t empty. See attached diagram for a proposal, e.g FailureToPay.

- Discuss comparison with other standards, determine whether we can move ahead with proposed FpML messaging changes. (see attached).

- Discuss Matthew’s proposal that unique trade identification be supported via validation rules, as described in the attached document (these are the validation rules that have been added for contract notification). (I am particularly interested how this approach might work in a central service provider context when there are multiple trade IDs on a message).

- AOB