[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Important Update - Event Id
- To: <loanwg@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Important Update - Event Id
- From: "Bhavik Katira" <bhavik.katira@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:39:21 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language:message-id; bh=8JRumHf5iCw+nnRIBKDf9nvGw9r7JPUu+1kZoghRxDs=; b=pt38Dp/b2xIMJeJaMQx8uJJEROrY5duD3F1bOHtiwCCQNeczYQbzrwUWKEpxHfZMheurU72Xd5M1Zs6RrScJTc9DGI0HJP66qVe58kRobbKRms8m1fnSQVmW1R4KmvsbpY64+oRN3I6Q50osQrudBe0FwnEpeeFqzd7Yz4BrH90=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language:message-id; b=C6vEJy4eKqgod7E8LwEMQAi26I9rpqlwltpcmnvRtq3XvN8yT2dwwO+VyCD9YjmEVLcw/FJWHPbL3wQUjpk1ZYKxYvzL9Xsxct58pqs3rAeFvMF8xG0yP9TuPjqs9up4q2pE0f+fU8ko10oNhPcAiejMuMRvmRcqBSUo0RHXpYw=
- In-reply-to:
- References:
- Reply-to: loanwg@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: loanwg@xxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcjFl3kIIYEDNLpDQUaxbme8zhRMQwAALWXw
Title: RE: Important Update - Event Id
A follow up question to this is whether people think that we should have the ability to store multiple event id’s…?
I.e. different vendors may want to store their own id’s in the messages…
Any feedback on this from anyone…?
_____________________________________________
From: Bhavik Katira [mailto:bhavik.katira@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:33 PM
To: 'loanwg@xxxxxxxx'
Subject: Important Update - Event Id
All,
It came to our attention that in previous discussions we spoke about introducing a business event id to all of our notices.
In the current design, there is a “message id” in the header section, which is unique for every single message sent out.
However, if for any reason there are multiple messages sent out all referring to the same business event then they should all have the same “event id”. This event id has been introduced at the Facility Notice and Loan Contract Notice levels. It is a required field and the sender of the message would populate the id based on their own scheme definition.
Please take a look at the attached and provide any feedback ASAP.
Note: The event id type used is inherited from an existing FpML structure.
Thanks,
BK
<< File: eventid.doc >>