[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: FpML-IRD Stubs representation
Both of the below proposals make perfect sense to me.
Thanks
Jamie
-----Original Message-----
From: irdwg@xxxxxxxx [mailto:irdwg@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
harry.mcallister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 5:26 PM
To: irdwg@xxxxxxxx
Cc: iyermakova@xxxxxxxx; mgratacos@xxxxxxxx
Subject: FpML-IRD Stubs representation
All,
I'd like to draw your attention to a couple of proposed changes to the
stubs model under InterestRateStream. The changes are essentially
technical and are not expected to affect compliant instance documents -
they are discussed on the FpML issues list at:
http://www.fpml.org/issues/view.php?id=518:
Change the cardinality of StubValue/floatingRate, from 1..* to 1..2.
Rationale: the stub can be produced with a single rate/tenor,
applicable
for the broken period, or with two rate/tenors, interpreted as bounds
for calculation of an interpolated rate. More than two instances of
StubValue/floatingRate are inconsistent with the existing annotation,
not meaningful in business terms, and should not be permitted by the
schema.
Change the content model of StubCalculationPeriodAmount to enforce
the
presence of at-least-one-of initialStub|finalStub. Rationale: at
present
both elements are optional, so StubCalculationPeriodAmount can be
produced with no stub content, contrary to the documented intended
usage, while remaining schema-valid. This change aligns the content
model with the analagous StubCalculationPeriod in eq-shared.
I believe these changes are straighforward rationalisations of the model
- your comments and observations are invited.
Best regards,
Harry McAllister
Chair, FpML IRD-WG
Fixed Income Architecture
BNP Paribas
+44 20 7595 3416
This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for
the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately
notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any
dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited
except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of
this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable
for the message if modified.
************************************************************************
**********************
BNP Paribas Private Bank London Branch is authorised by CECEI & AMF and
is regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of its
investment business in the United Kingdom.
BNP Paribas Securities Services London Branch is authorised by CECEI &
AMF and is regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct
of its investment business in the United Kingdom.
BNP Paribas Fund Services UK Limited is authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
To unsubscribe: Email majordomo@xxxxxxxx with a blank subject line In
the body include the line: unsubscribe irdwg youremail@address To view
archives: http://www.fpml.org/_wgmail/_irdwgmail/threads.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: Email majordomo@xxxxxxxx with a blank subject line
In the body include the line: unsubscribe irdwg youremail@address
To view archives: http://www.fpml.org/_wgmail/_irdwgmail/threads.html