All, Please note that there is a call today at 15:00 London / 10:00 New York. AGENDA: 1. Minutes / Actions from last call (attached) 2. Review of physical options proposal (attached) 3. Date of next call and future topics - Return swaps on commodity indices - Emissions 4. AOB Dial in details: US: 1 888 481 3032 UK: 0 800 904 7961 Intl: 1 617 801 9600 Participant Code: 52016709 Regards, Owen King +44 20 3367 0347
Attachment:
FpML Physical Commodities Proposal - Options v1.doc
Description: FpML Physical Commodities Proposal - Options v1.doc
Attachment:
fpml-com-4-7.zip
Description: fpml-com-4-7.zip
--- Begin Message ---
- To: <commwg@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: FpML-Com 2009-10-02 Minutes
- From: "Owen King" <Owen.King@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 17:29:33 +0100
- Reply-to: <commwg@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: <commwg@xxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcpDfYYz1G2gTXeOTKye/rWpYtNrBQ==
- Thread-topic: FpML-Com 2009-10-02 Minutes
* Present Marc Gratacos, ISDA Raphael Iyageh, GS Owen King, MarkitSERV (Chair) Irina Yermakova, ISDA William Wise, MarkitSERV * Apologies Farzad Moshfeghi, Barcap Peter Stockman, DTCC * Review outstanding actions >> FM to clarify the intended use of RelativeDates/scheduleBounds FM was not on the call. Since the current proposed schema does not use this element, this action is closed. [Closed] >> MG to clarify the intended use of RelativeDates/scheduleBounds MG had not been able to do this. Since the current proposed schema does not use this element, this action is closed. [Closed] >> DM to propose an alternative structure for physically settled options that uses the existing commodityOption type DM was not on today's call [Closed] * Minutes 1. Physical Options - Review of physical options proposal + MG indicated that he felt the PeriodicDates type was appropriate within EuropeanExercise to represent expiration dates on a multiple-expiry trade. + OK said he would appreciate further feedback from the group as to whether they also agreed. + OK noted that it was common to make expiration dates relative to an event such as a nomination deadline which could repeat for each delivery period. OK will review a similar concept used in the oil leg to determine its applicability here. + RI wondered whether having both strikePricePerUnit and fixedPrice might be clearer than only fixedPrice. OK then suggested that not including strikePricePerUnit would also allow floating price physical options without additional work since the floating price component would be included within the underlying physical trade. RI said that he didn't have a preference on this point. 2. Change of leg selection in Commodity Swap from choice group to substitution group. - The change had been discussed by the group previously but IY noted that it breaks backwards-compatibility by enforcing a minimum of two legs. - The group discussed the pros and cons of enforcing this restriction and decided that since the substitution group structure is intended to allow implementing institutions considerable flexibility in implementing new legs it was conceivable that a single-leg product might in some situations be correct, so this restriction will be removed. * Actions [New] OK to review the oil physical leg and apply the date-relative-to-event approach within the physicalExercise component. * Next meeting 15:00 UK / 10:00 US Fri 16th October 2009 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe: Email majordomo@xxxxxxxx with a blank subject line In the body include the line: unsubscribe commwg youremail@address To view archives: http://www.fpml.org/_wgmail/_commwgmail/threads.html
--- End Message ---