All,
Please note that there is a call today at 15:00 London / 10:00 New York.
AGENDA:
1. Minutes / Actions from last call (attached)
2. Physical Options
- Review of discussion paper (attached)
3. Change of commoditySwap leg choice structure to substitution group
- Schema and diagram attached
4. Additions to coding schemes
- contractualDefinitionsScheme
+ EFETGas - EFET General Agreement Concerning The Delivery And
Acceptance of Natural Gas
+ EFETElectricity - EFET General Agreement Concerning the Delivery
and Acceptance of Electricity
+ GTMA - FOA Grid Trade Master Agreement
+ EEIPower - EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement
+ NAESBGas - NAESB Base Contract for Sale and Purchase of Natural
Gas
+ NBP1997 - Short Term Flat NBP Trading Terms and Conditions (NBP
1997)
+ ZBT2004 - Zeebrugge Hub Natural Gas Trading Terms and Conditions
(ZBT 2004)
+ SCoTA - globalCOAL Standard Coal Trading Agreement
+ MCPSA2006 - CTA 2006 Master Coal Purchase and Sale Agreement
5. AOB
Dial in details:
US: 1 888 481 3032
UK: 0 800 904 7961
Intl: 1 617 801 9600
Participant Code: 52016709
Regards,
Owen King
+44 20 7071 0137
The content of this e-mail and accompanying communications and attachments (collectively, this "e-mail") are confidential to Markit Group Holdings Limited, its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, "Markit") and may contain information which is legally privileged or protected from disclosure under applicable law or agreement. This email may be read and used only by the intended recipient, and any disclosure, printing, copying, distribution (including forwarding), use, saving, or taking any action based on, the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is expressly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 20 7260 2000 and delete it. You agree to take full responsibility for checking this email for viruses, and Markit shall not be responsible or liable for any damages arising from or relating to its use. Markit reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Markit makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of this email and hereby disclaims any liability of any kind for the information contained herein. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Markit. For full details about Markit, its offerings and legal terms and conditions, please see Markit's website at http://www.markit.com <http://www.markit.com/> .
Attachment:
FpML Physical Commodities Discussion - Options v1.doc
Description: FpML Physical Commodities Discussion - Options v1.doc
--- Begin Message ---
- To: <commwg@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: FpML-Com 2009-08-07 Minutes
- From: "Owen King" <owen.king@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:28:38 +0100
- Reply-to: <commwg@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: <commwg@xxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcoXc7ybTwF9pwa7RGWPfwAAwUBOdg==
- Thread-topic: FpML-Com 2009-08-07 Minutes
* Present Marc Gratacos, ISDA Raphael Iyageh, GS Owen King, Markit (Chair) Farzad Moshfeghi, BarCap Dinesh Shastri, Bloomberg William Wise, Markit Irina Yermakova, ISDA * Review outstanding actions >> All to provide copies of physically-settled option confirmations [Carried forward] * Minutes Dinesh Shastri introduced himself to the group. Dinesh works in Bloomberg's OTC derivatives group, primarily on rates but is looking to increase the use of FpML across asset classes. 1. Physical Options - Structural overview of the proposal + FM suggested that a substitution group would be more appropriate than a choice group for the choice of PhysicalSettlement elements as it would provide for extension without the need to modify the schema directly. DM agreed. + OK asked for MG's opinion on this as there have been previous instances where this approach was not considered optimal - MG felt that in this case it was a good idea. The group agreed to use a substitution group and OK also noted that this approach should be considered for the choice of physical legs within the CommoditySwap type. + FM thought that modifying the existing CommodityOption type would be preferable to creating a new type of CommodityPhysicalOption. + The group discussed this at length. OK noted that the two products were potentially very different and that many of the fields would differ - as opposed to cash vs. physical settlement of a financial product the physical delivery of a commodity against a fixed strike differs considerably from the movement of cash based on the observation of an Commodity Reference Price. RI and DM, however were inclined to consider these as similar products and FM pointed out the overheads involved in maintaining a larger group of products. + OK felt this issue was worth reaching a consensus on and invited the group to put forward alternative proposals. OK also suggested that further research be done into floating price physical options to see how these compared to financial options. + OK also asked for confirmations showing daily expiring options as these are likely to have a significant impact on the schema structure. RI said he would attempt to find a sample confirmation. - Business questions + RI thought bullion options could include multiple deliveries and will try to find an example confirmation. 2. AOB - MG proposed that the currently available commodity products are added to the list of FpML product types (http://www.fpml.org/coding-scheme/product-type-simple-1-2.xml). There were no objections. - OK proposed that now the working group is well established and focusing increasingly on the technical aspects of the schema it move to a bi-weekly schedule. The group agreed. * Actions [Carried Forward] All to provide copies of physically-settled option confirmations [New] RI to try and provide a confirmation for a daily expiring physically-settled option [New] RI to try and provide a confirmation for a bullion option with multiple deliveries [New] OK to update the schema to use a substitution group for the choice of physical settlement details [New] FM to propose an alternative structure for physically settled options that uses the existing commodityOption type [New] DM to propose an alternative structure for physically settled options that uses the existing commodityOption type * Next meeting 15:00 UK / 10:00 US Fri 21st August 2009 The content of this e-mail and accompanying communications and attachments (collectively, this "e-mail") are confidential to Markit Group Holdings Limited, its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, "Markit") and may contain information which is legally privileged or protected from disclosure under applicable law or agreement. This email may be read and used only by the intended recipient, and any disclosure, printing, copying, distribution (including forwarding), use, saving, or taking any action based on, the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is expressly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 20 7260 2000 and delete it. You agree to take full responsibility for checking this email for viruses, and Markit shall not be responsible or liable for any damages arising from or relating to its use. Markit reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Markit makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of this email and hereby disclaims any liability of any kind for the information contained herein. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Markit. For full details about Markit, its offerings and legal terms and conditions, please see Markit's website at http://www.markit.com <http://www.markit.com/> .
--- End Message ---
Attachment:
fpml-com-4-6.xsd
Description: fpml-com-4-6.xsd
Attachment:
commoditySwap.png
Description: commoditySwap.png