[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FpML-BP Cash flow Matching, Netting and Settlement Guidelines




Hi Sreedhar,

Please see my response to your query, below.

Best regards,
Harry




__________________________________________________________________________
Harry McAllister
| Information Architect | Fixed Income Architecture | BNP Paribas
4R223 | 10 Harewood Avenue | London NW1 6AA
tel
: +44 (0)20 7595 3416 | email :
harry.mcallister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Internet  
ssegu@xxxxxxxx

Sent by: bpwg@xxxxxxxx

02/06/2010 20:36

Please respond to
bpwg@xxxxxxxx

To
bpwg@xxxxxxxx
cc
rptwg@xxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: FpML-BP Cash flow Matching, Netting and Settlement Guidelines






Hi All,

    In continuation with the previous BP/RPT WG meeting discussion, I am attaching modified schemas to implement NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted.

As proposed and agreed by the WG members changes to the existing TradeCashflowsAsserted structure are kept minimum.


Following are the required changes to implement NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted.


Option 1:


• Added NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted complex type in the fpml-reconciliation-4-8.xsd which will have similar structure as TradeCashflowsAsserted.

• Added PartyTradeIdentifierReference complex type in fpml-shared-4-8.xsd
• Added partyTradeIdentifierReference element of type PartyTradeIdentifierReference  in GrossCashflow complex type (fpml-reconciliation-4-8.xsd).

(Please see fpml-reconciliation-4-8_NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted.xsd, fpml-shared-4-8_NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted.xsd schemas).

 
Option 2:


• Added NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted complex type in the fpml-reconciliation-4-8.xsd which will have similar structure as TradeCashflowsAsserted.

• Added partyTradeIdentifier element of type PartyTradeIdentifier in GrossCashflow complex type  in the fpml-reconciliation-4-8.xsd

(Please see fpml-reconciliation-4-8_NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted_partyTradeIdentifier.xsd schema).


As suggested by Harry, Option 1 looks more promising than option 2.


Harry, in your suggestion below to implement NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted, why do we need to "Create a group NettedTradeCashflows.model, identical to TradeCashflows.model except for multiple (unbounded) occurrence of tradeIdentifyingItems". "partyTradeIdentifier" element in tradeIdentifyingItems is already unbound. So probably we can use one tradeIdentifyingItems element and multiple partyTradeIdentifier elements. Your thoughts?

Agreed, partyTradeIdentifier has multiple occurrence within tradeIdentifiyingItems - but I believe the intention is to permit the inclusion of multiple partyTradeIdentifier blocks for the same trade, with each partyTradeIdentifier  belonging to a different party  - not multiple partyTradeIdentifier  blocks for multiple distinct trades, as per your suggested usage. This would be consistent with usage seen elsewhere in FpML.

I hope that makes sense ...?


Also attaching initial DTCC proposal to add tradeId element in the GrossCashflow section as well as ISDA Cashflow Matching, Netting and Settlement Guidelines for reference.





Thanks,
Sreedhar.
------------------------------------------------------------
The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation
DTCC  : Business Analysis & Design
55 Water Street - New York, NY 10041
Office     :  212 855 2364



Sreedhar Segu/DTCC

05/28/2010 01:45 PM


To
bpwg@xxxxxxxx
cc
mgratacos@xxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: FpML-BP Cash flow Matching, Netting and Settlement GuidelinessLink






Harry,

      Your proposal looks interesting and make sense to me. I will try to work using this approach.


Thanks for your thoughts.


Thanks,
Sreedhar.
------------------------------------------------------------
The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation
DTCC  : Business Analysis & Design
55 Water Street - New York, NY 10041
Office     :  212 855 2364



harry.mcallister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: bpwg@xxxxxxxx

05/28/2010 01:18 PM

Please respond to
bpwg@xxxxxxxx

To
bpwg@xxxxxxxx
cc
mgratacos@xxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: FpML-BP Cash flow Matching, Netting and Settlement Guideliness








All,


Please see attached a (very) draft proposal for a revised "NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted" message structure, to support assertion of cashflows netted across multiple trades. The proposal is presented in the expectation of criticism and further modification (I don't lay any claims to expertise in the cashflow matching domain).


Changes to the existing TradeCashflowsAsserted structure are kept to a minimum, consistent with supporting the extended functional requirement:
I considered specialising GrossCashflow to restrict the existence of partyTradeIdentifierReference to the "Netted" message, but this would require creation of new types for each component of the PaymentMatching/CalculationDetails/GrossCashflow type hierarchy, with little obvious benefit (the presence of an optional, single-valued grossCashflow/partyTradeIdentifierReference within the non-netted message is not obviously harmful).

In the proposed use, a single tradeIdentifyingItems block would be produced for each trade against which payments are asserted for reconciliation, for example:


     
<tradeIdentifyingItems>
             
<partyTradeIdentifier id="aardvark">
                     
<partyReference href="DTCC00006440"/>
                     
<tradeId tradeIdScheme="TradeRefNbr">0000000001000000</tradeId>
             
</partyTradeIdentifier>
     
</tradeIdentifyingItems>
Then a cashflow referencing the identified trade as its parent would look like:


     
<grossCashflow>
             
<cashflowId>Trade1354248_2318819</cashflowId>
             
<partyTradeIdentifierReference href="aardvark"/>
             
<payerPartyReference href="abcref"/>
             
<receiverPartyReference href="xyzref"/>
             
<cashflowAmount>
                     
<currency>USD</currency>
                     
<amount>41.13</amount>
             
</cashflowAmount>
             
<cashflowType cashflowTypeScheme="http://www.fpml.org/coding-scheme/cashflow-               type">AssignmentFee</cashflowType>
     
</grossCashflow>

This is a little neater than producing a full partyTradeIdentifier block within each grossCashflow.


I attach a copy of the modified schema (lazy implementation, all in one file - PartyTradeIdentifierReference properly belongs in fpml-shared).


Best regards,

Harry







__________________________________________________________________________
Harry McAllister
| Information Architect | Fixed Income Architecture | BNP Paribas
4R223 | 10 Harewood Avenue | London NW1 6AA
tel
: +44 (0)20 7595 3416 | email :
harry.mcallister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Internet  
ssegu@xxxxxxxx

Sent by: bpwg@xxxxxxxx

28/05/2010 16:11

Please respond to
bpwg@xxxxxxxx


To
bpwg@xxxxxxxx
cc
rptwg@xxxxxxxx
Subject
FpML-BP Cash flow Matching, Netting and Settlement Guideliness










Thanks,
Sreedhar.
------------------------------------------------------------
The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation
DTCC  : Business Analysis & Design
55 Water Street - New York, NY 10041
Office     :  212 855 2364


_____________________________________________________________

DTCC DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately and delete the email and any attachments from your system. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.


___________________________________________________________
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited.

Please refer to http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-845C5H  for additional disclosures.




_____________________________________________________________

DTCC DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately and delete the email and any attachments from your system. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

___________________________________________________________
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited.

Please refer to http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-845C5H  for additional disclosures.

Attachment: fpml-reconciliation-4-7.NettedTradeCashflows.xsd
Description: Binary data

Attachment: FpML Proposal.docx
Description: Binary data

Attachment: stratcashflowfinal111604.pdf
Description: Binary data

Attachment: fpml-reconciliation-4-8_NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted.xsd
Description: Binary data

Attachment: fpml-shared-4-8_NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted.xsd
Description: Binary data

Attachment: fpml-reconciliation-4-8_NettedTradeCashflowsAsserted_partyTradeIdentifier.xsd
Description: Binary data