|
See below comment from Peter Stockman.
The issue has been logged into the issues tracking system:
http://www.fpml.org/issues/view.php?id=1009
From: Peter C. Stockman [peter.c.stockman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 11:42 PM To: Marc Gratacos Subject: Re: FpML-BP AWG Teleconference May 27 at 9am NYC/2pm LON Just a note with regard to Simone’s analysis and suggestion.
Using her analysis approach xxxRequest [noun] xxxAcknowledgement [noun] xxxException [noun] xxxRequestCancellation [verb] or XXXRequestWithdrawal [verb] or XXXRequestRetraction [verb] xxx[Status] [noun] or xxx[Response] [noun] If the change is made then the third, containing three options, should be something like: xxxCancellationRequest [noun] or xxxWithdrawalRequest [noun] or xxxRetractionRequest [noun] Simone’s suggestion breaks the consistency rule she is advocating. Peter On 5/19/10 3:56 PM, "Marc Gratacos" <MGratacos@xxxxxxxx> wrote: An issue regarding FpML 5.0 Messaging has been reported by LCH.Clearnet. I'd like to have an AWG meeting next week on May 27 at 9am NYTime to discuss this particular issue. See attached a description and summary of the issue. -- Peter C. Stockman +1 860 663 1810 (Office & Voicemail) +1 917 968 7406 (Cell) peter.c.stockman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.deeprivergroup.com The information contained in either this email and, if applicable, the attachment, are confidential and are intended only for the recipient. The contents of either the email or the attachment may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any use, disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail at isda@xxxxxxxx <mailto:isda@xxxxxxxx> then delete the e-mail and all attachments and any copies thereof. This communication is part of an ISDA process and is not intended for unauthorized use or distribution. |