[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: FpML-BP minutes 2007-08-01


I did some googling:

[contract] execution - (law) the completion of a legal instrument (such as a contract or deed) by signing it (and perhaps sealing and delivering it) so that it becomes legally binding and enforceable

[trade execution] The definitions of trade execution relate more to the securities markets such as http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/tradexec.htm

Execution could be used in both contexts and wouldn't be incorrect.  It might be easier to figure out who gets executed if the affirmation or confirmation is wrong, and has a negative effect on a traders P&L ;-)

Regards, Bill
____________________________________________
Bill Hodgson, First Vice President
DTCC Deriv/SERV Business Development
Warehouse Value Added Services

Phone:    +44 (0) 207 650 1450
Mobile:   +44 (0) 7717 003140
Fax:        +44 (0) 207 650 1499
Address:  Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation,
Broadgate West, 7th Floor, 1 Snowden St, London, EC2A 2DQ
Web page: http://derivserv.dtcc.com/ 
____________________________________________


"Guy Gurden" <guy.gurden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpwg@xxxxxxxx

13/08/07 13:12

Please respond to
bpwg@xxxxxxxx
To
<bpwg@xxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: FpML-BP minutes 2007-08-01





I believe the term ‘trade execution’ is commonly used to refer to the trading event between 2 front-office staff when the terms of the trade are first agreed. So trading platforms such as TradeWeb, Bloomberg, Market Axess etc. are often referred to as ‘execution platforms’. I don’t agee that execution refers to reaching a legal agreement on platforms such as DTCC or SwapsWire other than in the broader use of the word ‘execution’ to refer to signing any form of document. So DTCC and SwapsWire are generally referred to as ‘confirmation platforms’.
 
Guy
 


From: bpwg@xxxxxxxx [mailto:bpwg@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bill Hodgson
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 5:37 AM
To: bpwg@xxxxxxxx
Cc: bpwg@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FpML-BP minutes 2007-08-01
 

IMHO:

Execution is a legal step, which is defined as the point at which the electronic records within a system become equivalent to and fully represent a binding contract between two parties. (in Deriv/SERV reaching the Matched status defines this point)

Affirmation and Confirmation are processes to reach an end-point where two parties (or three or four in the case of assignments) have indicated their agreement to an electronic record which is sufficient to achieve Execution of a contract (whether a new trade or post-trade event)

The Deriv/SERV platform supports Affirmation where one party can enter and communicate details of a contract to the other, where the 2nd party at a minimum responds with their own Trade Ref Id to achieve a Matched status, but can provide feedback by proposing alternative definitions for terms presented to them (e.g. different dates, rates, underlying) and the system enables both parties to communicate until a Match is reached.

The Deriv/SERV platform also supports matching, where both sides express their view of the terms of a contract and the system compares their electronic entries, both parties use the system and / or external communication to resolve the differences until a match is reached.

Regards, Bill
____________________________________________
Bill Hodgson, First Vice President
DTCC Deriv/SERV Business Development
Warehouse Value Added Services

Phone:    +44 (0) 207 650 1450
Mobile:   +44 (0) 7717 003140
Fax:        +44 (0) 207 650 1499
Address:  Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation,
Broadgate West, 7th Floor, 1 Snowden St, London, EC2A 2DQ
Web page: http://derivserv.dtcc.com/  
____________________________________________

"Marc Gratacos" <mgratacos@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpwg@xxxxxxxx

02/08/07 14:44


Please respond to
bpwg@xxxxxxxx
To
bpwg@xxxxxxxx
cc
 
Subject
FpML-BP minutes 2007-08-01

 


   






BPWG

Participants
Marie-Paule Dumont (SWIFT)
Lucio Iida (BGI)
Pierre Lamy (GS)
Francoise Massin (SWIFT)
Banu Apers (SWIFT)
Brian Lynn (GEM)
Irina Yermakova (ISDA)
Marc Gratacos (ISDA), chair

Discussion
- Views for short-form confirmations

The idea is to use the views mechanism to separate the schema representation of short and long form confirmations. Different working groups apply different modelling approaches to the representation of short and long form confirmations. By applying the views mechanism, the result should be a simpler schema representation and with less optionality for both short and long form confirmations.

Even though there was agreement among participants that this is a very good idea. There were some issues that were pointed out:
The agreement was to get additional feedback from the Coordination Committee to see whether participants are interested in using views to distinguish between short and long form confirmations.

- Trade Execution
The relationship with trade affirmation and between trade affirmation and confirmation is not clear.  

The participants in the meeting expressed that execution, affirmation, and confirmation could be three separate processes. According to BGI, the trade is executed, and then it gets validated in the affirmation process before it is sent to a confirmation provider or to other recipient.

Additional input from institutions is necessary in order to have a clear definition of the processes.

- Option Exercise/Expiry
It will be discussed it in the next meeting. Marc will circulate a proposal.
Please let me know if I missed any point. Thanks in advance.
We'll meet again in August 15.


________________________________________________________
DTCC DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately and delete the email and any attachments from your system. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.



 
This is a commercial communication sent by SwapsWire Limited. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.

SwapsWire Limited is regulated by the Financial Services Authority and is entered in the FSA's Register (FSA Reference Number 207294). SwapsWire Limited is subject to Value Added Tax (VAT Registration No 761 4444 34). SwapsWire Limited is registered in England at Companies House, no: 4027741. Registered Office: One Silk Street, London, EC2Y 8HQ

If you have any questions in relation to this policy please contact us at:
Fountain House
130 Fenchurch Street
London EC3M 5DJ
Attn: Rachel Cunningham-Day, General Counsel
Email: Rachel.cunningham-day@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

If you currently receive marketing information from us which you would prefer not to receive in the future please email us at info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. All email messages sent to and from info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx may be monitored to ensure compliance with internal policies and to protect our business